Conjunction Fallacy

Bibliography

AGNOLI, F. and D.H. KRANTZ, 1989. Suppressing natural heuristics by formal instruction: the case of the conjunction fallacy. Cognitive psychology(Print). [Cited by 38] (1.96/year)
AHN, W. and J. BAILENSON, 1996. … as a Search for Underlying Mechanisms: An Explanation of the Conjunction Fallacy and the Discounting …. Cognitive Psychology. [Cited by 50] (4.03/year)
AHNEMAN, D.K. and A. TVERSKY, 1983. Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgement. Psychological Review. [Cited by 2] (0.08/year)
ANDERSON, B.L., 1998. Stereovision: beyond disparity computations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. [Cited by 9] (0.86/year)
ANDERSON, J.L., 1998. Embracing uncertainty: the interface of Bayesian statistics and cognitive psychology. Conservation Ecology. [Cited by 65] (6.24/year)
BAR-HILLEL, M., 1991. Commentary on Wolford, Taylor, and Beck: The conjunction fallacy?. Mem Cognit. [Cited by 11] (0.63/year)
BAR-HILLEL, M. and E. NETER, 1993. How Alike Is It Versus How Likely Is It: A Disjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgments. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. [Cited by 29] (1.88/year)
BAZERMAN, M.H. and A. TENBRUNSEL, 1998. The Role of Social Context on Decisions: Integrating Social Cognition and Behavioral Decision …. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. [Cited by 5] (0.48/year)
BENASSI, V.A. and R.L. KNOTH, 1993. The Intractable Conjunction Fallacy: Statistical Sophistication, Instructional Set, and Training. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY. [Cited by 10] (0.65/year)
BETSCH, T. and K. FIEDLER, 1999. Understanding conjunction effects in probability judgments: the role of implicit mental models. European Journal of Social Psychology. [Cited by 42] (4.46/year)
BODENHAUSEN, G.V., 1990. STEREOTYPES AS JUDGMENTAL HEURISTICS: EVIDENCE OF CIRCADIAN VARIATIONS IN DISCRIMINATION. Psychological Science. [Cited by 178] (9.67/year)
BONINI, N., K. TENTORI and D. OSHERSON, 2004. A Different Conjunction Fallacy. Mind & Language. [Cited by 11] (2.49/year)
BRACHINGER, H.W. and P.A. MONNEY, 2003. The conjunction fallacy: explanations of the linda problem by the theory of hints. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. [Cited by 4] (0.74/year)
CAMERER, C.F. and H. KUNREUTHER, 1989. Decision Processes for Low Probability Events: Policy Implications. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. [Cited by 154] (7.93/year)
CHASE, V.M., R. HERTWIG and G. GIGERENZER, 1998. Visions of rationality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. [Cited by 89] (8.54/year)
COBOS, P.L., et al., 1993. Connectionism and probability judgment: Suggestions on biases. Proceedings of the 15th annual conference of the Cognitive …. [Cited by 5] (0.32/year)
CRANDALL, C.S. and B. GREENFIELD, 1986. Understanding the conjunction fallacy: A conjunction of effects. Social Cognition. [Cited by 13] (0.58/year)
DAVIDSON, D., 1995. The representativeness heuristic and the conjunction fallacy effect in children's decision making. Merrill-Palmer quarterly(1960). [Cited by 33] (2.46/year)
DULANY, D.E., … Hilton, DJ (1991). Conversational implicature, conscious representation, and the conjunction fallacy. Social Cognition. [Cited by 2] (?/year)
DULANY, D.E. and D.J. HILTON, 1991. Conversational implicature, conscious representation, and the conjunction fallacy. Social cognition. [Cited by 108] (6.20/year)
EINHORN, H.J., 1985. A Model of the Conjunction Fallacy.. [Cited by 4] (0.17/year)
FABRE, J.M., J.P. CAVERNI and H. JUNGERMANN, 1995. Causality Does Influence Conjunctive Probability Judgments If Context and Design Allow for It. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. [Cited by 4] (0.30/year)
FANTINO, E., 1998. Behavior analysis and decision making. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. [Cited by 46] (4.42/year)
FANTINO, E., et al., 1997. The Conjunction Fallacy: A Test of Averaging Hypotheses. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN AND REVIEW. [Cited by 48] (4.20/year)
FANTINO, E., S. STOLARZ-FANTINO and A. NAVARRO, AContext for Science with a Commitment to Behavior Change. LOGICAL FALLACIES: A BEHAVIORAL APPROACH TO REASONING. [Cited by 37] (?/year)
FIEDLER, K., 1988. The dependence of the conjunction fallacy on subtle linguistic factors. Psychological Research. [Cited by 122] (5.98/year)
FISK, J.E., 2004. 1 Conjunction fallacy. Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook On Fallacies And Biases In …. [Cited by 4] (0.91/year)
FISK, J.E., 1996. The Conjunction Effect: Fallacy or Bayesian Inference?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. [Cited by 10] (0.81/year)
FISK, J.E., 2004. Conjunction fallacy. Cognitive illusions. [Cited by 2] (0.45/year)
FISK, J.E. and N. PIDGEON, 1997. The conjunction fallacy: The case for the existence of competing heuristic strategies. British journal of psychology(1953). [Cited by 10] (0.88/year)
FISK, J.E. and N. PIDGEON, 1998. CONDITIONAL PROBABILITIES, POTENTIAL SURPRISE, AND THE CONJUNCTION FALLACY. The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A. Human …. [Cited by 5] (0.48/year)
FISK, J.E. and N. PIDGEON, 1996. Component probabilities and the conjunction fallacy: Resolving signed summation and the low …. Acta Psychologica. [Cited by 4] (0.32/year)
FRANCO, R., 2007. Quantum mechanics, Bayes' theorem and the conjunction fallacy. Arxiv preprint quant-ph/0703222. [Cited by 5] (3.53/year)
FRANCO, R., 2007. The conjunction fallacy and interference effects. Arxiv preprint arXiv:0708.3948. [Cited by 5] (3.53/year)
FREDERICK, D.M. and R. LIBBY, 1986. Expertise and auditors' judgments of conjunctive events. Journal of Accounting Research. [Cited by 64] (2.85/year)
GARFIELD, J., 1995. How students learn statistics. INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW. [Cited by 180] (13.42/year)
GIGERENZER, G., 1994. Why the distinction between single-event probabilities and frequencies is important for psychology ( …. Subjective Probability. [Cited by 142] (9.85/year)
GIGERENZER, G., 1997. On Narrow Norms and Vague Heuristics: A Reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996). [Cited by 143] (12.53/year)
GIGERENZER, G., 1993. The bounded rationality of probabilistic mental models. Rationality: Psychological and philosophical perspectives. [Cited by 69] (4.48/year)
GIGERENZER, G., 1997. Bounded Rationality Models of Fast and Frugal Inference. REVUE SUISSE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE ET DE STATISTIQUE. [Cited by 27] (2.36/year)
GIGERENZER, G., 1991. How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond “Heuristics and Biases”. European Review of Social Psychology. [Cited by 347] (19.92/year)
GIGERENZER, G., 2001. Content-blind norms, no norms, or good norms? A reply to Vranas. Cognition. [Cited by 11] (1.48/year)
GIGERENZER, G. and T. REGIER, 1996. How Do We Tell an Association From a Rule? Comment on Sloman (1996). PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN. [Cited by 25] (2.01/year)
HERTWIG, R., 1995. Why Dr. Gould's Homonculus Doesn't Think Like Dr. Gould: The" conjunction Fallacy" Reconsidered. Hartung-Gorre. [Cited by 7] (0.52/year)
HERTWIG, R., 1995. Why Dr. Gould's homunculus doesn't think like Dr. Gould: The ‘‘conjunction fallacy” reconsidered. [Cited by 3] (0.22/year)
HERTWIG, R. and G. GIGERENZER, 1999. TheConjunction Fallacy'Revisited: How Intelligent Inferences Look Like Reasoning Errors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. [Cited by 146] (15.50/year)
HERTWIG, R. and G. GIGERENZER, The “conjunction fallacy” revisited. How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors. [Cited by 2] (?/year)
HERTWIG, R. and V.M. CHASE, 1998. Many Reasons or Just One: How Response Mode Affects Reasoning in the Conjunction Problem. THINKING AND REASONING. [Cited by 20] (1.92/year)
HINTIKKA, J., 2004. A Fallacious Fallacy?. Synthese. [Cited by 6] (1.36/year)
JACOBS, J.E. and P.A. KLACZYNSKI, 2002. The Development of Judgment and Decision Making During Childhood and Adolescence. Current Directions in Psychological Science. [Cited by 65] (10.13/year)
J�NSSON, M.L. and J.A. HAMPTON, 2006. The inverse conjunction fallacy. Journal of Memory and Language. [Cited by 2] (0.83/year)
KAHNEMAN, D. and A. TVERSKY, 1983. Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Prob ability Judgment.”. Psychological Review. [Cited by 11] (0.43/year)
KAHNEMAN, D. and A. TVERSKY, 1996. On the Reality of Cognitive Illusions. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW-NEW YORK-. [Cited by 379] (30.52/year)
KAHNEMAN, D. and S. FREDERICK, 2002. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. [Cited by 349] (54.39/year)
KARIYAZONO, A., 1991. The study of conjunction fallacy in the probability judgment task of compound event. Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science. [Cited by 4] (0.23/year)
KLACZYNSKI, P.A., 2001. Analytic and Heuristic Processing Influences on Adolescent Reasoning and Decision-Making. Child Development. [Cited by 51] (6.88/year)
LANDAUER, T.K., D. LAHAM and P. FOLTZ, 1998. Learning Human-like Knowledge by Singular Value Decomposition: A Progress Report - ►k-a-t.com [PDF] . ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS. [Cited by 84] (8.06/year)
MACCHI, L., 1995. Pragmatic Aspects of the Base-rate Fallacy. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. [Cited by 50] (3.73/year)
MEDIN, D.L., et al., 2003. A relevance theory of induction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. [Cited by 60] (11.08/year)
MIYAMOTO, J.M. and E. DIBBLE, 1986. Counterfactual conditionals and the conjunction fallacy. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive …. [Cited by 4] (0.18/year)
MORIER, D.M. and E. BORGIDA, 1984. The Conjunction Fallacy: A Task Specific Phenomenon?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. [Cited by 34] (1.39/year)
MOSCONI, G. and L. MACCHI, 2001. The role of pragmatic rules in the conjunction fallacy. Mind & Society. [Cited by 7] (0.94/year)
MOSCONI, G. and L. MACCHI, 1996. Pragmatic factors in the conjunction fallacy. 3rd International Conference on Thinking, London. [Cited by 2] (0.16/year)
MOUTIER, S. and O. HOUDE, 2003. Judgement under uncertainty and conjunction fallacy inhibition training. Thinking & Reasoning. [Cited by 8] (1.48/year)
PFEIFER, N., 2002. … Investigations of Human Nonmonotonic Reasoning with a Focus on System P and the Conjunction Fallacy. Unpublished master's thesis, Institut fur Psychologie, …. [Cited by 5] (0.78/year)
PFEIFER, N. and G.D. KLEITER, 2005. Coherence and Nonmonotonicity in Human Reasoning. Synthese. [Cited by 14] (4.10/year)
POLITZER, G. and I.A. NOVECK, 1991. Are conjunction rule violations the result of conversational rule violations?. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. [Cited by 53] (3.04/year)
POLITZER, G. and L. MACCHI, 2000. Reasoning and pragmatics. Mind & Society. [Cited by 23] (2.73/year)
POULTON, E.C., 1994. Behavioral Decision Theory: A New Approach. books.google.com. [Cited by 43] (2.98/year)
RAUFASTE, E. and R. NEVES, 1998. Empirical evaluation of possibility theory in human radiological diagnosis. Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Artificial …. [Cited by 10] (0.96/year)
REYNA, V.F., 1991. Class inclusion, the conjunction fallacy, and other cognitive illusions. Developmental review. [Cited by 35] (2.01/year)
REYNA, V.F., F.J. LLOYD and C.J. BRAINERD, 2003. Memory, development, and rationality: An integrative theory of judgment and decision making. Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research. [Cited by 41] (7.57/year)
RIIS, J. and N. SCHWARZ, 2003. Approaching and Avoiding Linda: Motor Signals Influence the Conjunction Fallacy. Social Cognition. [Cited by 2] (0.37/year)
RUBINSTEIN, M. and B.E.R.K.E.L.E.Y. WALTER, 2000. Rational Markets--yes Or No?: The Affirmative Case. CFA Institute. [Cited by 123] (14.61/year)
SAPIR, E., 1944. Grading, A Study in Semantics. Philosophy of Science. [Cited by 150] (2.33/year)
SCHOEMAKER, P.J.H. and S.E.I. CENTER, 1993. Multiple Scenario Development: Its Conceptual and Behavioral Foundation. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL. [Cited by 171] (11.09/year)
SHAFIR, E. and R.A. LEBOEUF, 2002. R ATIONALITY. Annual Reviews in Psychology. [Cited by 154] (24.00/year)
SIDES, A., et al., 2002. On the reality of the conjunction fallacy. Memory & Cognition. [Cited by 25] (3.90/year)
SLOMAN, S.A., et al., 2003. Frequency illusions and other fallacies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. [Cited by 49] (9.05/year)
SMEDSLUND, J.A.N., 1990. A critique of Tversky and Kahneman's distinction between fallacy and misunderstanding. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. [Cited by 11] (0.60/year)
SMITH, E.E. and D.N. OSHERSON, 1989. Similarity and decision making. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. [Cited by 21] (1.08/year)
STANOVICH, K.E. and R.F. WEST, 1998. Individual Differences in Framing and Conjunction Effects. THINKING AND REASONING. [Cited by 44] (4.22/year)
STOLARZ-FANTINO, S., et al., 2003. The conjunction effect: New evidence for robustness. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY. [Cited by 35] (6.46/year)
STOLARZ-FANTINO, S., E. FANTINO and J. KULIK, 1996. The Conjunction Fallacy: Differential Incidence as a Function of Descriptive Frames and Educational …. Contemporary Educational Psychology. [Cited by 36] (2.90/year)
TENTORI, K., N. BONINI and D. OSHERSON, 2004. The conjunction fallacy: a misunderstanding about conjunction?. Cognitive Science. [Cited by 19] (4.30/year)
TENTORI, K., N. BONINI and D. OSHERSON, 2004. Conjunction and the conjunction fallacy. Cognitive Science. [Cited by 2] (0.45/year)
THIIRING, M., H. JUNGERMANN and F.R. GERMANY, 1986. CONSTRUCTING AND FUNNING MENTAL MODELS FOR INFERENCES ABOUT THE FUTURE. New Directions in Research on Decision Making. [Cited by 17] (0.76/year)
THURING, M. and H. JUNGERMANN, 1990. The conjunction fallacy: Causality vs. event probability. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making. [Cited by 18] (0.98/year)
TVERSKY, A., … . D.(1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning. The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review. [Cited by 3] (?/year)
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1983. Probability, representativeness, and the conjunction fallacy. Psychological Review. [Cited by 18] (0.71/year)
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1983. Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probablistic Reasoning. Psychological Review. [Cited by 7] (0.28/year)
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1981. Judgments of and by Representativeness.. [Cited by 258] (9.41/year)
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1983. Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment, 90 Psych. [Cited by 3] (0.12/year)
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1983. Extensional versus intensional reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review. [Cited by 3] (0.12/year)
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 2004. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Preference, Belief, and Similarity: Selected Writings. [Cited by 830] (187.92/year)
VRANAS, P.B.M., 2001. Single-case probabilities and content-neutral norms: a reply to Gigerenzer. Cognition. [Cited by 4] (0.54/year)
WEISER, E., Social Psychology. ericweiser.com. [Cited by 31] (?/year)
WOLFORD, G., 1991. The conjunction fallacy? A reply to Bar-Hillel. Memory and Cognition. [Cited by 5] (0.29/year)
WOLFORD, G., H.A. TAYLOR and J.R. BECK, 1990. The conjuction fallacy?. Memory & cognition. [Cited by 26] (1.41/year)
ZIZZO, D.J., et al., 2000. A violation of the monotonicity axiom: experimental evidence on the conjunction fallacy. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. [Cited by 49] (5.82/year)