Conjunction Fallacy

Bibliography

AGNOLI, F. and D.H. KRANTZ, 1989. Suppressing natural heuristics by formal instruction: The case of the conjunction fallacy. Cognitive Psychology. [Cited by 30] (1.64/year)
AHN, W. and J. BAILENSON, 1996. … as a Search for Underlying Mechanisms: An Explanation of the Conjunction Fallacy and the Discounting …. Cognitive Psychology. [Cited by 38] (3.38/year)
AHNEMAN, D.K. and A. TVERSKY, 1983. Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgement. Psychological Review. [Cited by 2] (0.08/year)
ANDERSON, B.L., 1998. Stereovision: beyond disparity computations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2 (6). [Cited by 8] (0.87/year)
ANDERSON, J.L., 2001. Stone-age minds at work on 21st century science. Conservation Biology in Practice. [Cited by 9] (1.44/year)
ANDERSON, J.L., 1998. Embracing uncertainty: the interface of Bayesian statistics and cognitive psychology. Conservation Ecology. [Cited by 54] (5.84/year)
BAR-HILLEL, M., 1991. Commentary on Wolford, Taylor, and Beck: The conjunction fallacy?. Mem Cognit. [Cited by 12] (0.74/year)
BAR-HILLEL, M. and E. NETER, 1993. How alike is it versus how likely is it: A disjunction fallacy in probability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. [Cited by 24] (1.69/year)
BAZERMAN, M.H. and A. TENBRUNSEL, 1998. The Role of Social Context on Decisions: Integrating Social Cognition and Behavioral Decision …. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. [Cited by 5] (0.54/year)
BEACH, L.R., V.E. BARNES and J.J.J. CHRISTENSEN-SZALANSKI, 1986. Beyond heuristics and biases: A contingency model of judgmental forecasting. Journal of Forecasting. [Cited by 16] (0.75/year)
BENASSI, V.A. and R.L. KNOTH, 1993. The intractable conjunction fallacy: Statistical sophistication, instructional set, and training. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality. [Cited by 6] (0.42/year)
BETSCH, T. and K. FIEDLER, 1999. Understanding conjunction effects in probability judgments: the role of implicit mental models. European Journal of Social Psychology. [Cited by 40] (4.85/year)
BLESS, H., T. BETSCH and A. FRANZEN, 1998. Framing the framing e? ect: The impact of context cues on solutions to theAsian disease'problem. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. [Cited by 26] (2.81/year)
BONINI, N., K. TENTORI and D. OSHERSON, 2004. A Different Conjunction Fallacy. Mind and Language. [Cited by 3] (0.93/year)
BONINI, N., K. TENTORI and D. OSHERSON, 2004. A new conjunction fallacy. Mind & Language. [Cited by 1] (0.31/year)
BRACHINGER, H.W. and P.A. MONNEY, 2003. The conjunction fallacy: explanations of the linda problem by the theory of hints. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. [Cited by 3] (0.71/year)
CHASE, V.M., R. HERTWIG and G. GIGERENZER, 1998. Visions of rationality. Trends in Cognitive Science. [Cited by 77] (8.33/year)
CRANDALL, C.S. and B. GREENFIELD, 1986. Understanding the conjunction fallacy: A conjunction of effects. Social Cognition. [Cited by 7] (0.33/year)
DAVIDSON, D., 1995. The representativeness heuristic and the conjunction fallacy effect in children's decision making. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. [Cited by 29] (2.37/year)
DULANY, D.E., … Hilton, DJ (1991). Conversational implicature, conscious representation, and the conjunction fallacy. Social Cognition. [Cited by 2] (?/year)
DULANY, D.E. and D.J. HILTON, 1991. Conversational implicature, conscious representation, and the conjunction fallacy. Social cognition. [Cited by 92] (5.66/year)
EINHORN, H.J., 1985. A Model of the Conjunction Fallacy. stinet.dtic.mil. [Cited by 2] (0.09/year)
EREV, I. and B.L. COHEN, 1990. Verbal versus numerical probabilities: efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox. Organizational behavior and human decision processes(Print). [Cited by 52] (3.02/year)
FABRE, J.M., J.P. CAVERNI and H. JUNGERMANN, 1995. Causality does influence conjunctive probability judgments if context and design allow for it. Organizational behavior and human decision processes(Print). [Cited by 3] (0.25/year)
FANTINO, E., 1998. Behavior analysis and decision making. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. [Cited by 41] (4.44/year)
FANTINO, E., et al., 2000. A Violation Of The Monotonicity Axiom: Experimental Evidence On The Conjunction Fallacy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. [Cited by 45] (6.21/year)
FANTINO, E., et al., 1997. The conjunction fallacy: A test of averaging hypotheses. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. [Cited by 43] (4.20/year)
FANTINO, E., S. STOLARZ-FANTINO and A. NAVARRO, 2003. Logical fallacies: A behavioral approach to reasoning. The Behavior Analyst Today. [Cited by 37] (8.72/year)
FIEDLER, K., 1988. The dependence of the conjunction fallacy on subtle linguistic factors. Psychological Research. [Cited by 90] (4.68/year)
FISCHBEIN, E. and D. SCHNARCH, 1997. The Evolution with Age of Probabilistic, Intuitively Based Misconceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. [Cited by 62] (6.05/year)
FISK, J.E., 1996. The Conjunction Effect: Fallacy or Bayesian Inference?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. [Cited by 9] (0.80/year)
FISK, J.E., Publcation Name: British Journal of Psychology. The conjunction fallacy: The case for the existence of competing heuristic strategies.. [Cited by 8] (?/year)
FISK, J.E., 1998. Conditional Probabilities, Potential Surprise, and the Conjunction Fallacy. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A. [Cited by 5] (0.54/year)
FISK, J.E., 2004. Conjunction fallacy. [Cited by 2] (0.62/year)
FISK, J.E., 1998. Can the conjunction fallacy be accounted for in terms of support theory. Manuscript submitted for publication. [Cited by 2] (0.22/year)
FISK, J.E. and N. PIDGEON, 1996. Component probabilities and the conjunction fallacy: Resolving signed summation and the low …. Acta Psychologica. [Cited by 4] (0.36/year)
FRANCO, R., 2007. Quantum mechanics, Bayes' theorem and the conjunction fallacy. Arxiv preprint quant-ph/0703222. [Cited by 3] (8.09/year)
FRANCO, R., Arxiv preprint physics/070. The conjunction fallacy and interference effects. [Cited by 1] (?/year)
FREDERICK, D.M. and R. LIBBY, 1986. Expertise and Auditors' Judgments of conjunctive Events. Journal of Accounting Research. [Cited by 44] (2.07/year)
GAVANSKI, I. and D.R. ROSKOS-EWOLDSEN, 1991. Representativeness and conjoint probability.. J Pers Soc Psychol. [Cited by 21] (1.29/year)
GIGERENZER, G., 1996. On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996). Psychological Review. [Cited by 192] (17.08/year)
GIGERENZER, G., 1997. Bounded Rationality: Models of Fast and Frugal Inference. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics. [Cited by 19] (1.86/year)
GIGERENZER, G., 1991. How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond “Heuristics and Biases”. European Review of Social Psychology. [Cited by 278] (17.12/year)
GIGERENZER, G. and T. REGIER, 1996. How do we tell an association from a rule? Comment on Sloman (1996). Psychological Bulletin. [Cited by 24] (2.13/year)
GILOVICH, T., et al., 2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. books.google.com. [Cited by 296] (56.47/year)
HERTWIG, R., 1995. Why Dr. Gould's Homonculus Doesn't Think Like Dr. Gould: The" conjunction Fallacy" Reconsidered. Hartung-Gorre. [Cited by 9] (0.74/year)
HERTWIG, R., 1998. Many Reasons or Just One: How Response Mode Affects Reasoning in the Conjunction Problem. Thinking & Reasoning. [Cited by 14] (1.51/year)
HERTWIG, R. and G. GIGERENZER, 1999. TheConjunction Fallacy'Revisited: How Intelligent Inferences Look Like Reasoning Errors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. [Cited by 119] (14.44/year)
HERTWIG, R. and G. GIGERENZER, 1996. The ‘conjunction fallacy'revisited: Polysemy, conversational maxims, and frequency judgments. International Journal of Psychology. [Cited by 3] (0.27/year)
HERTWIG, R. and G. GIGERENZER, The “conjunction fallacy” revisited. How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors. [Cited by 2] (?/year)
HERTWIG, R. and G. GIGERENZER, 1996. The" Conjunction Fallacy" revisited: How intelligent errors look like reasoning errors. [Cited by 2] (0.18/year)
HINTON, G.E., COGNSCI86P. Learning distributed representations of concepts. [Cited by 227] (?/year)
JONSSON, M.L. and J.A. HAMPTON, 2006. The Inverse Conjunction Fallacy. [Cited by 1] (0.81/year)
KAHNEMAN, D. and A. TVERSKY, 1983. Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Prob? ability Judgment.”. Psychological Review. [Cited by 5] (0.21/year)
KAHNEMAN, D. and S. FREDERICK, 2002. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. [Cited by 237] (45.21/year)
KARIYAZONO, A., 1991. The study of conjunction fallacy in the probability judgment task of compound event. Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science. [Cited by 4] (0.25/year)
KEMP, R., 1997. Reasoning and delusions. The British Journal of Psychiatry. [Cited by 35] (3.42/year)
KLACZYNSKI, P.A., 2001. Analytic and Heuristic Processing Influences on Adolescent Reasoning and Decision-Making. Child Development. [Cited by 36] (5.77/year)
KUNDA, Z., 1999. Social Cognition: Making Sense of People. books.google.com. [Cited by 226] (27.42/year)
LANDAUER, T.K., D. LAHAM and P. FOLTZ, 1998. Learning human-like knowledge by singular value decomposition: A progress report. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. [Cited by 67] (7.25/year)
LEVI, I., 1985. Illusions about Uncertainty. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. [Cited by 8] (0.36/year)
MACCHI, L., 1995. Pragmatic Aspects of the Base-rate Fallacy. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. [Cited by 43] (3.51/year)
MIYAMOTO, J.M. and E. DIBBLE, 1986. Counterfactual conditionals and the conjunction fallacy. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive …. [Cited by 3] (0.14/year)
MORIER, D.M. and E. BORGIDA, 1984. The Conjunction Fallacy: A Task Specific Phenomenon?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. [Cited by 28] (1.20/year)
MOSCONI, G. and L. MACCHI, 2001. The role of pragmatic rules in the conjunction fallacy. Mind & Society. [Cited by 5] (0.80/year)
MOSCONI, G. and L. MACCHI, 1996. Pragmatic factors in the conjunction fallacy. 3rd International Conference on Thinking, London. [Cited by 2] (0.18/year)
MOUTIER, S. and O. HOUD?, 2003. Judgement under uncertainty and conjunction fallacy inhibition training. Thinking & Reasoning. [Cited by 3] (0.71/year)
NAHINSKY, I.D., D. ASH and B. COHEN, 1986. The conjunction fallacy: judgmental heuristic or faulty extensional reasoning?. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. [Cited by 1] (0.05/year)
PFEIFER, N., 2002. … investigations on human nonmonotonic reasoning with a focus on System P and the conjunction fallacy. Unpublished master's thesis, Institut fur Psychologie, …. [Cited by 5] (0.95/year)
PFEIFER, N. and G.D. KLEITER, 2005. Coherence and Nonmonotonicity in Human Reasoning. Synthese. [Cited by 10] (4.46/year)
POLITZER, G. and I.A. NOVECK, 1991. Are conjunction rule violations the result of conversational rule violations?. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. [Cited by 41] (2.52/year)
POLITZER, G. and L. MACCHI, 2000. Reasoning and pragmatics. Mind & Society. [Cited by 18] (2.49/year)
POULTON, E.C., 1994. Behavioral Decision Theory: A New Approach. books.google.com. [Cited by 33] (2.49/year)
RAUFASTE, E. and R. NEVES, 1998. Empirical evaluation of possibility theory in human radiological diagnosis. Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Artificial …. [Cited by 10] (1.08/year)
REYNA, V.F., 1991. Class inclusion, the conjunction fallacy, and other cognitive illusions. Developmental review. [Cited by 23] (1.42/year)
RIIS, J. and N. SCHWARZ, 2003. APPROACHING AND AVOIDING LINDA: MOTOR SIGNALS INFLUENCE THE CONJUNCTION FALLACY. Social Cognition. [Cited by 1] (0.24/year)
RUBINSTEIN, M. and B.E.R.K.E.L.E.Y. WALTER, 2000. Rational Markets--yes Or No?: The Affirmative Case. CFA Institute. [Cited by 87] (12.01/year)
SAMUELS, R. and S.P. STICH, 2004. Rationality and psychology. The Oxford. [Cited by 37] (11.41/year)
SCHOEMAKER, P.J.H., 1993. Multiple Scenario Development: Its Conceptual and Behavioral Foundation. Strategic Management Journal. [Cited by 119] (8.36/year)
SHAFIR, E. and R.A. LEBOEUF, 2002. RATIONALITY. Annual Review of Psychology. [Cited by 105] (20.03/year)
SHAFIR, E.B., E.E. SMITH and D.N. OSHERSON, 1990. Typicality and reasoning fallacies.. Mem Cognit. [Cited by 32] (1.86/year)
SIDES, A., et al., 2002. On the reality of the conjunction fallacy. Memory & Cognition. [Cited by 11] (2.10/year)
SIDES, A., et al., 2001. On the reality of the conjunction fallacy (Tech. Rep.). Rice University, Houston. [Cited by 1] (0.16/year)
SLOMAN, S.A. and J.M. STIBEL, 2001. Making the conjunction fallacy transparent: Explaining the frequency effect. Manuscript submitted for publication. [Cited by 1] (0.16/year)
SLOMAN, S.A., et al., 2003. Frequency illusions and other fallacies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. [Cited by 32] (7.54/year)
STANOVICH, K.E., 1998. Individual Differences in Framing and Conjunction Effects. Thinking & Reasoning. [Cited by 29] (3.14/year)
STOLARZ-FANTINO, S., et al., 2003. The Conjunction Effect: New Evidence for Robustness. The American Journal of Psychology. [Cited by 32] (7.54/year)
STOLARZ-FANTINO, S., E. FANTINO and J. KULIK, 1996. The Conjunction Fallacy: Differential Incidence as a Function of Descriptive Frames and Educational …. Contemporary Educational Psychology. [Cited by 33] (2.94/year)
TEIGEN, K.H., M. MARTINUSSEN and T. LUND, 1996. Linda versus World Cup: Conjunctive Probabilities in Three-event Fictional and Real-life Predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Muking. [Cited by 12] (1.07/year)
TENTORI, K., N. BONINI and D. OSHERSON, 2004. The conjunction fallacy: a misunderstanding about conjunction?. Cognitive Science. [Cited by 8] (2.47/year)
TENTORI, K., N. BONINI and D. OSHERSON, 2004. Conjunction and the conjunction fallacy. Cognitive Science. [Cited by 2] (0.62/year)
THURING, M. and H. JUNGERMANN, 1990. The conjunction fallacy: causality vs. event probability. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making. [Cited by 13] (0.75/year)
TVERSKY, A., … , D.(1983).? Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment …. Psychological Review. [Cited by 2] (?/year)
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1983. Probability, representativeness, and the conjunction fallacy. Psychological Review. [Cited by 15] (0.62/year)
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1982. Judgments of and by representativeness. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. [Cited by 155] (6.14/year)
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1983. Extensional versus intensional reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgements. Psychological Review. [Cited by 3] (0.12/year)
TVERSKY, A. and D. KAHNEMAN, 1983. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review. [Cited by 547] (22.56/year)
WOLFORD, G., 1991. The conjunction fallacy?: A reply to Bar-Hillel. Memory and Cognition. [Cited by 5] (0.31/year)
WOLFORD, G., H.A. TAYLOR and J.R. BECK, 1990. The conjunction fallacy?. Mem Cognit. [Cited by 19] (1.10/year)
??, ?.?., 1983. Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probabilistic Judgment'. Psychological Review. [Cited by 1] (0.04/year)